Javascript required
Skip to content Skip to sidebar Skip to footer
Home / Picture That Are Compose of Many Circle Express What in Art

Picture That Are Compose of Many Circle Express What in Art

Early-20th-century avant-garde art movement

Not to be confused with QBism.

Cubism is an early-20th-century advanced art move that revolutionized European painting and sculpture, and inspired related movements in music, literature and architecture. In Cubist artwork, objects are analyzed, broken up and reassembled in an bathetic form—instead of depicting objects from a single viewpoint, the artist depicts the subject from a multitude of viewpoints to represent the subject in a greater context.[ane] Cubism has been considered the near influential art move of the 20th century.[two] [3] The term is broadly used in clan with a broad variety of art produced in Paris (Montmartre and Montparnasse) or near Paris (Puteaux) during the 1910s and throughout the 1920s.

The movement was pioneered past Pablo Picasso and Georges Braque, and joined by Jean Metzinger, Albert Gleizes, Robert Delaunay, Henri Le Fauconnier, Juan Gris, and Fernand Léger.[four] One master influence that led to Cubism was the representation of iii-dimensional form in the late works of Paul Cézanne.[5] A retrospective of Cézanne's paintings had been held at the Salon d'Automne of 1904, electric current works were displayed at the 1905 and 1906 Salon d'Automne, followed by two commemorative retrospectives after his decease in 1907.[6]

In France, offshoots of Cubism developed, including Orphism, abstract art and later Purism.[seven] [8] The impact of Cubism was far-reaching and broad-ranging. In France and other countries Futurism, Suprematism, Dada, Constructivism, Vorticism, De Stijl and Art Deco developed in response to Cubism. Early Futurist paintings hold in common with Cubism the fusing of the past and the present, the representation of different views of the subject pictured at the same time or successively, also called multiple perspective, simultaneity or multiplicity,[ix] while Constructivism was influenced by Picasso'due south technique of amalgam sculpture from separate elements.[10] Other mutual threads between these disparate movements include the faceting or simplification of geometric forms, and the association of mechanization and modern life.

History [edit]

Historians have divided the history of Cubism into phases. In one scheme, the first stage of Cubism, known every bit Analytic Cubism, a phrase coined by Juan Gris a posteriori,[11] was both radical and influential as a short but highly significant art move betwixt 1910 and 1912 in French republic. A 2d phase, Synthetic Cubism, remained vital until around 1919, when the Surrealist move gained popularity. English art historian Douglas Cooper proposed some other scheme, describing three phases of Cubism in his book, The Cubist Epoch. According to Cooper in that location was "Early Cubism", (from 1906 to 1908) when the movement was initially adult in the studios of Picasso and Braque; the 2d phase being called "High Cubism", (from 1909 to 1914) during which time Juan Gris emerged every bit an important exponent (later 1911); and finally Cooper referred to "Late Cubism" (from 1914 to 1921) as the final stage of Cubism as a radical avant-garde move.[12] Douglas Cooper's restrictive use of these terms to distinguish the work of Braque, Picasso, Gris (from 1911) and Léger (to a bottom extent) unsaid an intentional value sentence.[v]

Pablo Picasso, 1909–x, Effigy dans un Fauteuil (Seated Nude, Femme nue assise), oil on canvas, 92.1 × 73 cm, Tate Modernistic, London

Proto-Cubism: 1907–1908 [edit]

Cubism burgeoned between 1907 and 1911. Pablo Picasso's 1907 painting Les Demoiselles d'Avignon has often been considered a proto-Cubist work.

In 1908, in his review of Georges Braque'due south exhibition at Kahnweiler's gallery, the critic Louis Vauxcelles called Braque a daring man who despises form, "reducing everything, places and a figures and houses, to geometric schemas, to cubes".[fourteen] [15]

Vauxcelles recounted how Matisse told him at the time, "Braque has but sent in [to the 1908 Salon d'Automne] a painting made of niggling cubes".[xv] The critic Charles Morice relayed Matisse'southward words and spoke of Braque's footling cubes. The motif of the viaduct at fifty'Estaque had inspired Braque to produce iii paintings marked by the simplification of form and deconstruction of perspective.[sixteen]

Georges Braque'south 1908 Houses at L'Estaque (and related works) prompted Vauxcelles, in Gil Blas, 25 March 1909, to refer to bizarreries cubiques (cubic oddities).[17] Gertrude Stein referred to landscapes made by Picasso in 1909, such as Reservoir at Horta de Ebro, as the get-go Cubist paintings. The first organized group exhibition by Cubists took place at the Salon des Indépendants in Paris during the spring of 1911 in a room called 'Salle 41'; it included works past Jean Metzinger, Albert Gleizes, Fernand Léger, Robert Delaunay and Henri Le Fauconnier, yet no works past Picasso or Braque were exhibited.[5]

By 1911 Picasso was recognized every bit the inventor of Cubism, while Braque'south importance and precedence was argued later on, with respect to his handling of space, volume and mass in the Fifty'Estaque landscapes. But "this view of Cubism is associated with a distinctly restrictive definition of which artists are properly to be called Cubists," wrote the art historian Christopher Green: "Marginalizing the contribution of the artists who exhibited at the Salon des Indépendants in 1911 [...]"[five]

The assertion that the Cubist depiction of space, mass, time, and volume supports (rather than contradicts) the flatness of the canvas was made past Daniel-Henry Kahnweiler as early as 1920,[eighteen] but it was subject to criticism in the 1950s and 1960s, especially past Clement Greenberg.[xix]

Contemporary views of Cubism are complex, formed to some extent in response to the "Salle 41" Cubists, whose methods were too singled-out from those of Picasso and Braque to be considered just secondary to them. Culling interpretations of Cubism have therefore developed. Wider views of Cubism include artists who were later associated with the "Salle 41" artists, eastward.g., Francis Picabia; the brothers Jacques Villon, Raymond Duchamp-Villon and Marcel Duchamp, who kickoff in tardily 1911 formed the core of the Section d'Or (or the Puteaux Grouping); the sculptors Alexander Archipenko, Joseph Csaky and Ossip Zadkine likewise as Jacques Lipchitz and Henri Laurens; and painters such as Louis Marcoussis, Roger de La Fresnaye, František Kupka, Diego Rivera, Léopold Survage, Auguste Herbin, André Lhote, Gino Severini (after 1916), María Blanchard (after 1916) and Georges Valmier (after 1918). More fundamentally, Christopher Dark-green argues that Douglas Cooper's terms were "later undermined past interpretations of the work of Picasso, Braque, Gris and Léger that stress iconographic and ideological questions rather than methods of representation."[v]

John Berger identifies the essence of Cubism with the mechanical diagram. "The metaphorical model of Cubism is the diagram: The diagram being a visible symbolic representation of invisible processes, forces, structures. A diagram demand not eschew certain aspects of advent only these too will be treated as signs not as imitations or recreations."[20]

Early Cubism: 1909–1914 [edit]

Albert Gleizes, L'Homme au Balcon, Homo on a Balcony (Portrait of Dr. Théo Morinaud), 1912, oil on sail, 195.half-dozen × 114.9 cm (77 × 45 one/4 in.), Philadelphia Museum of Fine art. Completed the same year that Albert Gleizes co-authored the book Du "Cubisme" with Jean Metzinger. Exhibited at Salon d'Automne, Paris, 1912, Armory prove, New York, Chicago, Boston, 1913

There was a distinct difference between Kahnweiler's Cubists and the Salon Cubists. Prior to 1914, Picasso, Braque, Gris and Léger (to a lesser extent) gained the support of a single committed art dealer in Paris, Daniel-Henry Kahnweiler, who guaranteed them an annual income for the exclusive right to buy their works. Kahnweiler sold only to a small circle of connoisseurs. His support gave his artists the liberty to experiment in relative privacy. Picasso worked in Montmartre until 1912, while Braque and Gris remained at that place until after the First Globe War. Léger was based in Montparnasse.[v]

In dissimilarity, the Salon Cubists built their reputation primarily by exhibiting regularly at the Salon d'Automne and the Salon des Indépendants, both major not-academic Salons in Paris. They were inevitably more aware of public response and the need to communicate.[5] Already in 1910 a group began to grade which included Metzinger, Gleizes, Delaunay and Léger. They met regularly at Henri le Fauconnier'southward studio about the boulevard du Montparnasse. These soirées often included writers such as Guillaume Apollinaire and André Salmon. Together with other young artists, the grouping wanted to emphasise a research into course, in opposition to the Neo-Impressionist accent on color.[21]

Louis Vauxcelles, in his review of the 26th Salon des Indépendants (1910), made a passing and imprecise reference to Metzinger, Gleizes, Delaunay, Léger and Le Fauconnier as "ignorant geometers, reducing the human body, the site, to pallid cubes."[22] [23] At the 1910 Salon d'Automne, a few months afterwards, Metzinger exhibited his highly fractured Nu à la cheminée (Nude), which was subsequently reproduced in both Du "Cubisme" (1912) and Les Peintres Cubistes (1913).[24]

The first public controversy generated past Cubism resulted from Salon showings at the Indépendants during the spring of 1911. This showing by Metzinger, Gleizes, Delaunay, le Fauconnier and Léger brought Cubism to the attending of the general public for the first time. Amongst the Cubist works presented, Robert Delaunay exhibited his Eiffel Tower, Tour Eiffel (Solomon R. Guggenheim Museum, New York).[25]

The "Cubists" Dominate Paris' Fall Salon, The New York Times, Oct 8, 1911. Picasso's 1908 Seated Woman (Meditation) is reproduced along with a photograph of the artist in his studio (upper left). Metzinger'due south Baigneuses (1908–09) is reproduced top right. Also reproduced are works by Derain, Matisse, Friesz, Herbin, and a photo of Braque

At the Salon d'Automne of the aforementioned year, in addition to the Indépendants group of Salle 41, were exhibited works past André Lhote, Marcel Duchamp, Jacques Villon, Roger de La Fresnaye, André Dunoyer de Segonzac and František Kupka. The exhibition was reviewed in the Oct 8, 1911 issue of The New York Times. This article was published a twelvemonth after Gelett Burgess' The Wild Men of Paris,[26] and two years prior to the Arsenal Show, which introduced astonished Americans, accustomed to realistic fine art, to the experimental styles of the European avant garde, including Fauvism, Cubism, and Futurism. The 1911 New York Times article portrayed works by Picasso, Matisse, Derain, Metzinger and others dated before 1909; not exhibited at the 1911 Salon. The commodity was titled The "Cubists" Boss Paris' Fall Salon and subtitled Eccentric Schoolhouse of Painting Increases Its Vogue in the Current Art Exhibition – What Its Followers Attempt to Do. [27] [28]

Among all the paintings on exhibition at the Paris Fall Salon none is alluring then much attention as the extraordinary productions of the so-chosen "Cubist" school. In fact, dispatches from Paris suggest that these works are easily the chief feature of the exhibition. [...]

In spite of the crazy nature of the "Cubist" theories the number of those professing them is fairly respectable. Georges Braque, André Derain, Picasso, Czobel, Othon Friesz, Herbin, Metzinger—these are a few of the names signed to canvases earlier which Paris has stood and now again stands in blank amazement.

What do they mean? Take those responsible for them taken get out of their senses? Is it art or madness? Who knows?[27] [28]

Salon des Indépendants [edit]

The subsequent 1912 Salon des Indépendants located in Paris (20 March to 16 May 1912) was marked by the presentation of Marcel Duchamp's Nude Descending a Staircase, No. 2, which itself caused a scandal, fifty-fifty amongst the Cubists. Information technology was in fact rejected past the hanging commission, which included his brothers and other Cubists. Although the work was shown in the Salon de la Section d'Or in October 1912 and the 1913 Arsenal Show in New York, Duchamp never forgave his brothers and sometime colleagues for censoring his piece of work.[21] [29] Juan Gris, a new addition to the Salon scene, exhibited his Portrait of Picasso (Fine art Constitute of Chicago), while Metzinger's two showings included La Femme au Cheval (Adult female with a equus caballus) 1911–1912 (National Gallery of Kingdom of denmark).[30] Delaunay's monumental La Ville de Paris (Musée d'art moderne de la Ville de Paris) and Léger's La Noce, The Wedding (Musée National d'Art Moderne, Paris), were besides exhibited.

Galeries Dalmau [edit]

In 1912, Galeries Dalmau presented the first alleged group exhibition of Cubism worldwide (Exposició d'Fine art Cubista),[31] [32] [33] with a controversial showing past Jean Metzinger, Albert Gleizes, Juan Gris, Marie Laurencin and Marcel Duchamp (Barcelona, twenty April to 10 May 1912). The Dalmau exhibition comprised 83 works by 26 artists.[34] [35] [36] Jacques Nayral's association with Gleizes led him to write the Preface for the Cubist exhibition,[31] which was fully translated and reproduced in the paper La Veu de Catalunya.[37] [38] Duchamp's Nude Descending a Staircase, No. 2 was exhibited for the showtime time.[39]

Extensive media coverage (in newspapers and magazines) earlier, during and after the exhibition launched the Galeries Dalmau as a force in the development and propagation of modernism in Europe.[39] While press coverage was extensive, it was non always positive. Articles were published in the newspapers Esquella de La Torratxa [forty] and El Noticiero Universal [41] attacking the Cubists with a series of caricatures laced with derogatory text.[41] Art historian Jaime Brihuega writes of the Dalmau testify: "No dubiousness that the exhibition produced a strong commotion in the public, who welcomed it with a lot of suspicion.[42]

Salon d'Automne [edit]

The Cubist contribution to the 1912 Salon d'Automne created scandal regarding the utilize of authorities owned buildings, such equally the Grand Palais, to exhibit such artwork. The indignation of the political leader Jean Pierre Philippe Lampué made the front end page of Le Journal, 5 October 1912.[43] The controversy spread to the Municipal Council of Paris, leading to a debate in the Chambre des Députés about the use of public funds to provide the venue for such fine art.[44] The Cubists were dedicated by the Socialist deputy, Marcel Sembat.[44] [45] [46]

It was confronting this groundwork of public anger that Jean Metzinger and Albert Gleizes wrote Du "Cubisme" (published by Eugène Figuière in 1912, translated to English and Russian in 1913).[47] Amongst the works exhibited were Le Fauconnier's vast composition Les Montagnards attaqués par des ours (Mountaineers Attacked by Bears) now at Rhode Isle Schoolhouse of Design Museum, Joseph Csaky's Deux Femme, Two Women (a sculpture now lost), in add-on to the highly abstract paintings past Kupka, Amorpha (The National Gallery, Prague), and Picabia, La Source (The Leap) (Museum of Modern Fine art, New York).

Abstraction and the ready-made [edit]

The most extreme forms of Cubism were not those skilful by Picasso and Braque, who resisted total abstraction. Other Cubists, past contrast, especially František Kupka, and those considered Orphists past Apollinaire (Delaunay, Léger, Picabia and Duchamp), accustomed abstraction by removing visible subject matter entirely. Kupka'due south two entries at the 1912 Salon d'Automne, Amorpha-Fugue à deux couleurs and Amorpha chromatique chaude, were highly abstruse (or nonrepresentational) and metaphysical in orientation. Both Duchamp in 1912 and Picabia from 1912 to 1914 developed an expressive and allusive abstraction dedicated to complex emotional and sexual themes. Beginning in 1912 Delaunay painted a series of paintings entitled Simultaneous Windows, followed by a series entitled Formes Circulaires, in which he combined planar structures with bright prismatic hues; based on the optical characteristics of juxtaposed colors his deviation from reality in the depiction of imagery was quasi-complete. In 1913–14 Léger produced a serial entitled Contrasts of Forms, giving a similar stress to color, line and form. His Cubism, despite its abstract qualities, was associated with themes of mechanization and mod life. Apollinaire supported these early on developments of abstract Cubism in Les Peintres cubistes (1913),[24] writing of a new "pure" painting in which the subject was vacated. But in spite of his apply of the term Orphism these works were then dissimilar that they defy attempts to place them in a single category.[v]

Likewise labeled an Orphist by Apollinaire, Marcel Duchamp was responsible for another farthermost development inspired by Cubism. The ready-fabricated arose from a joint consideration that the work itself is considered an object (only as a painting), and that information technology uses the material detritus of the world (as collage and papier collé in the Cubist structure and Aggregation). The next logical step, for Duchamp, was to present an ordinary object as a self-sufficient work of art representing just itself. In 1913 he attached a bicycle wheel to a kitchen stool and in 1914 selected a canteen-drying rack as a sculpture in its own right.[v]

Section d'Or [edit]

The Department d'Or, likewise known as Groupe de Puteaux, founded past some of the most conspicuous Cubists, was a collective of painters, sculptors and critics associated with Cubism and Orphism, active from 1911 through about 1914, coming to prominence in the wake of their controversial showing at the 1911 Salon des Indépendants. The Salon de la Section d'Or at the Galerie La Boétie in Paris, October 1912, was arguably the well-nigh important pre-Globe War I Cubist exhibition; exposing Cubism to a wide audition. Over 200 works were displayed, and the fact that many of the artists showed artworks representative of their development from 1909 to 1912 gave the exhibition the allure of a Cubist retrospective.[48]

The grouping seems to take adopted the name Department d'Or to distinguish themselves from the narrower definition of Cubism developed in parallel past Pablo Picasso and Georges Braque in the Montmartre quarter of Paris, and to show that Cubism, rather than being an isolated art-form, represented the continuation of a chiliad tradition (indeed, the golden ratio had fascinated Western intellectuals of various interests for at least 2,400 years).[49]

The idea of the Section d'Or originated in the course of conversations between Metzinger, Gleizes and Jacques Villon. The grouping'south championship was suggested by Villon, after reading a 1910 translation of Leonardo da Vinci's Trattato della Pittura by Joséphin Péladan.

During the late 19th and early 20th centuries, Europeans were discovering African, Polynesian, Micronesian and Native American art. Artists such equally Paul Gauguin, Henri Matisse, and Pablo Picasso were intrigued and inspired past the stark power and simplicity of styles of those foreign cultures. Around 1906, Picasso met Matisse through Gertrude Stein, at a fourth dimension when both artists had recently acquired an involvement in primitivism, Iberian sculpture, African fine art and African tribal masks. They became friendly rivals and competed with each other throughout their careers, mayhap leading to Picasso entering a new period in his piece of work by 1907, marked by the influence of Greek, Iberian and African art. Picasso's paintings of 1907 have been characterized every bit Protocubism, equally notably seen in Les Demoiselles d'Avignon, the antecedent of Cubism.[13]

The art historian Douglas Cooper states that Paul Gauguin and Paul Cézanne "were particularly influential to the germination of Cubism and especially important to the paintings of Picasso during 1906 and 1907".[50] Cooper goes on to say: "The Demoiselles is generally referred to as the first Cubist picture show. This is an exaggeration, for although it was a major commencement step towards Cubism information technology is not yet Cubist. The disruptive, expressionist element in it is even reverse to the spirit of Cubism, which looked at the world in a detached, realistic spirit. Nevertheless, the Demoiselles is the logical picture show to take as the starting point for Cubism, because it marks the birth of a new pictorial idiom, because in it Picasso violently overturned established conventions and because all that followed grew out of it."[13]

The most serious objection to regarding the Demoiselles as the origin of Cubism, with its evident influence of primitive fine art, is that "such deductions are unhistorical", wrote the art historian Daniel Robbins. This familiar caption "fails to give adequate consideration to the complexities of a flourishing fine art that existed but before and during the menstruation when Picasso'due south new painting developed."[51] Between 1905 and 1908, a conscious search for a new way caused rapid changes in art across French republic, Frg, The netherlands, Italian republic, and Russia. The Impressionists had used a double betoken of view, and both Les Nabis and the Symbolists (who besides admired Cézanne) flattened the picture plane, reducing their subjects to simple geometric forms. Neo-Impressionist construction and subject area matter, most notably to be seen in the works of Georges Seurat (e.g., Parade de Cirque, Le Chahut and Le Cirque), was another important influence. In that location were also parallels in the development of literature and social thought.[51]

In addition to Seurat, the roots of cubism are to be found in the two distinct tendencies of Cézanne'southward afterwards work: starting time his breaking of the painted surface into pocket-sized multifaceted areas of paint, thereby emphasizing the plural viewpoint given by binocular vision, and second his interest in the simplification of natural forms into cylinders, spheres, and cones. Nonetheless, the cubists explored this concept farther than Cézanne. They represented all the surfaces of depicted objects in a single picture plane, as if the objects had all their faces visible at the same time. This new kind of depiction revolutionized the way objects could exist visualized in painting and art.

The historical study of Cubism began in the late 1920s, drawing at first from sources of express data, namely the opinions of Guillaume Apollinaire. It came to rely heavily on Daniel-Henry Kahnweiler'due south book Der Weg zum Kubismus (published in 1920), which centered on the developments of Picasso, Braque, Léger, and Gris. The terms "analytical" and "constructed" which subsequently emerged accept been widely accustomed since the mid-1930s. Both terms are historical impositions that occurred after the facts they identify. Neither phase was designated every bit such at the time respective works were created. "If Kahnweiler considers Cubism as Picasso and Braque," wrote Daniel Robbins, "our only fault is in subjecting other Cubists' works to the rigors of that limited definition."[51]

The traditional estimation of "Cubism", formulated post facto as a means of agreement the works of Braque and Picasso, has affected our appreciation of other twentieth-century artists. It is difficult to employ to painters such equally Jean Metzinger, Albert Gleizes, Robert Delaunay and Henri Le Fauconnier, whose fundamental differences from traditional Cubism compelled Kahnweiler to question whether to call them Cubists at all. Co-ordinate to Daniel Robbins, "To suggest that simply because these artists developed differently or varied from the traditional pattern they deserved to be relegated to a secondary or satellite role in Cubism is a profound fault."[51]

The history of the term "Cubism" usually stresses the fact that Matisse referred to "cubes" in connectedness with a painting by Braque in 1908, and that the term was published twice past the critic Louis Vauxcelles in a similar context. Notwithstanding, the word "cube" was used in 1906 by another critic, Louis Chassevent, with reference not to Picasso or Braque but rather to Metzinger and Delaunay:

"G. Metzinger is a mosaicist similar M. Signac but he brings more precision to the cutting of his cubes of colour which announced to accept been made mechanically [...]".[51] [52] [53]

The critical employ of the word "cube" goes back at to the lowest degree to May 1901 when Jean Béral, reviewing the piece of work of Henri-Edmond Cross at the Indépendants in Art et Littérature, commented that he "uses a big and square pointillism, giving the impression of mosaic. I even wonders why the artist has not used cubes of solid matter diversely colored: they would make pretty revetments." (Robert Herbert, 1968, p. 221)[53]

The term Cubism did non come into general usage until 1911, mainly with reference to Metzinger, Gleizes, Delaunay, and Léger.[51] In 1911, the poet and critic Guillaume Apollinaire accepted the term on behalf of a group of artists invited to exhibit at the Brussels Indépendants. The following year, in preparation for the Salon de la Section d'Or, Metzinger and Gleizes wrote and published Du "Cubisme" [54] in an effort to dispel the confusion raging around the word, and equally a major defence of Cubism (which had caused a public scandal following the 1911 Salon des Indépendants and the 1912 Salon d'Automne in Paris).[55] Clarifying their aims equally artists, this work was the start theoretical treatise on Cubism and it still remains the clearest and most intelligible. The issue, not solely a collaboration between its 2 authors, reflected discussions past the circumvolve of artists who met in Puteaux and Courbevoie. Information technology mirrored the attitudes of the "artists of Passy", which included Picabia and the Duchamp brothers, to whom sections of it were read prior to publication.[5] [51] The concept developed in Du "Cubisme" of observing a subject field from different points in space and time simultaneously, i.e., the human activity of moving around an object to seize it from several successive angles fused into a unmarried image (multiple viewpoints, mobile perspective, simultaneity or multiplicity), is a generally recognized device used by the Cubists.[56]

The 1912 manifesto Du "Cubisme" by Metzinger and Gleizes was followed in 1913 by Les Peintres Cubistes, a collection of reflections and commentaries by Guillaume Apollinaire.[24] Apollinaire had been closely involved with Picasso beginning in 1905, and Braque starting time in 1907, just gave as much attention to artists such as Metzinger, Gleizes, Delaunay, Picabia, and Duchamp.[5]

The fact that the 1912 exhibition had been curated to bear witness the successive stages through which Cubism had transited, and that Du "Cubisme" had been published for the occasion, indicates the artists' intention of making their work comprehensible to a broad audience (art critics, fine art collectors, art dealers and the general public). Undoubtedly, due to the slap-up success of the exhibition, Cubism became avant-garde motion recognized as a genre or fashion in art with a specific common philosophy or goal.[48]

Crystal Cubism: 1914–1918 [edit]

A significant modification of Cubism between 1914 and 1916 was signaled past a shift towards a strong emphasis on large overlapping geometric planes and flat surface activity. This grouping of styles of painting and sculpture, especially pregnant between 1917 and 1920, was practiced by several artists; particularly those under contract with the art dealer and collector Léonce Rosenberg. The tightening of the compositions, the clarity and sense of order reflected in these works, led to its being referred to by the critic Maurice Raynal as 'crystal' Cubism. Considerations manifested by Cubists prior to the outset of Globe War I—such as the fourth dimension, dynamism of modern life, the occult, and Henri Bergson's concept of elapsing—had now been vacated, replaced by a purely formal frame of reference.[57]

Crystal Cubism, and its associative rappel à l'ordre, has been linked with an inclination—by those who served the armed forces and by those who remained in the civilian sector—to escape the realities of the Cracking State of war, both during and directly following the conflict. The purifying of Cubism from 1914 through the mid-1920s, with its cohesive unity and voluntary constraints, has been linked to a much broader ideological transformation towards conservatism in both French order and French civilization.[5]

Cubism after 1918 [edit]

The most innovative period of Cubism was before 1914[ citation needed ]. Later on World War I, with the support given past the dealer Léonce Rosenberg, Cubism returned as a key issue for artists, and continued as such until the mid-1920s when its avant-garde status was rendered questionable past the emergence of geometric abstraction and Surrealism in Paris. Many Cubists, including Picasso, Braque, Gris, Léger, Gleizes, and Metzinger, while developing other styles, returned periodically to Cubism, even well later on 1925. Cubism reemerged during the 1920s and the 1930s in the work of the American Stuart Davis and the Englishman Ben Nicholson. In France, however, Cubism experienced a decline first in virtually 1925. Léonce Rosenberg exhibited not simply the artists stranded by Kahnweiler's exile but others including Laurens, Lipchitz, Metzinger, Gleizes, Csaky, Herbin and Severini. In 1918 Rosenberg presented a series of Cubist exhibitions at his Galerie de l'Effort Moderne in Paris. Attempts were made past Louis Vauxcelles to debate that Cubism was dead, but these exhibitions, along with a well-organized Cubist prove at the 1920 Salon des Indépendants and a revival of the Salon de la Section d'Or in the same year, demonstrated it was still alive.[5]

The reemergence of Cubism coincided with the appearance from almost 1917–24 of a coherent body of theoretical writing by Pierre Reverdy, Maurice Raynal and Daniel-Henry Kahnweiler and, amongst the artists, by Gris, Léger and Gleizes. The occasional return to classicism—figurative work either exclusively or alongside Cubist work—experienced by many artists during this period (called Neoclassicism) has been linked to the tendency to evade the realities of the state of war and also to the cultural authorisation of a classical or Latin image of French republic during and immediately following the war. Cubism after 1918 can be seen equally part of a wide ideological shift towards conservatism in both French lodge and civilisation. However, Cubism itself remained evolutionary both within the oeuvre of individual artists, such as Gris and Metzinger, and beyond the work of artists as unlike from each other as Braque, Léger and Gleizes. Cubism as a publicly debated motility became relatively unified and open to definition. Its theoretical purity made it a gauge against which such diverse tendencies equally Realism or Naturalism, Dada, Surrealism and abstraction could exist compared.[5]

Diego Rivera, Portrait de Messieurs Kawashima et Foujita, 1914

Influence in Asia [edit]

Japan and Prc were amid the first countries in Asia to exist influenced by Cubism. Contact offset occurred via European texts translated and published in Japanese fine art journals in the 1910s. In the 1920s, Japanese and Chinese artists who studied in Paris, for case those enrolled at the École nationale supérieure des Beaux-Arts, brought back with them both an understanding of modernistic art movements, including Cubism. Notable works exhibiting Cubist qualities were Tetsugorō Yorozu'southward Self Portrait with Cherry Optics (1912) and Fang Ganmin'south Tune in Autumn (1934).[59] [60]

Interpretation [edit]

Intentions and criticism [edit]

The Cubism of Picasso and Braque had more a technical or formal significance, and the distinct attitudes and intentions of the Salon Cubists produced different kinds of Cubism, rather than a derivative of their piece of work. "It is by no means articulate, in any instance," wrote Christopher Greenish, "to what extent these other Cubists depended on Picasso and Braque for their development of such techniques every bit faceting, 'passage' and multiple perspective; they could well have arrived at such practices with little knowledge of 'true' Cubism in its early stages, guided above all past their ain understanding of Cézanne." The works exhibited by these Cubists at the 1911 and 1912 Salons extended beyond the conventional Cézanne-like subjects—the posed model, still-life and landscape—favored by Picasso and Braque to include large-scale modern-life subjects. Aimed at a large public, these works stressed the employ of multiple perspective and circuitous planar faceting for expressive effect while preserving the eloquence of subjects endowed with literary and philosophical connotations.[5]

In Du "Cubisme" Metzinger and Gleizes explicitly related the sense of time to multiple perspective, giving symbolic expression to the notion of 'elapsing' proposed by the philosopher Henri Bergson according to which life is subjectively experienced every bit a continuum, with the past flowing into the present and the present merging into the future. The Salon Cubists used the faceted treatment of solid and space and effects of multiple viewpoints to convey a physical and psychological sense of the fluidity of consciousness, blurring the distinctions betwixt past, present and future. One of the major theoretical innovations made by the Salon Cubists, independently of Picasso and Braque, was that of simultaneity,[5] drawing to greater or lesser extent on theories of Henri Poincaré, Ernst Mach, Charles Henry, Maurice Princet, and Henri Bergson. With simultaneity, the concept of separate spatial and temporal dimensions was comprehensively challenged. Linear perspective developed during the Renaissance was vacated. The subject field matter was no longer considered from a specific point of view at a moment in fourth dimension, but built following a pick of successive viewpoints, i.e., as if viewed simultaneously from numerous angles (and in multiple dimensions) with the eye gratuitous to roam from one to the other.[56]

This technique of representing simultaneity, multiple viewpoints (or relative movement) is pushed to a high caste of complexity in Metzinger's Nu à la cheminée, exhibited at the 1910 Salon d'Automne; Gleizes' monumental Le Dépiquage des Moissons (Harvest Threshing), exhibited at the 1912 Salon de la Section d'Or; Le Fauconnier's Abundance shown at the Indépendants of 1911; and Delaunay's Urban center of Paris, exhibited at the Indépendants in 1912. These ambitious works are some of the largest paintings in the history of Cubism. Léger'southward The Wedding, besides shown at the Salon des Indépendants in 1912, gave course to the notion of simultaneity past presenting different motifs as occurring within a single temporal frame, where responses to the past and nowadays interpenetrate with commonage strength. The conjunction of such subject matter with simultaneity aligns Salon Cubism with early Futurist paintings past Umberto Boccioni, Gino Severini and Carlo Carrà; themselves made in response to early Cubism.[nine]

Cubism and modern European fine art was introduced into the U.s.a. at the now legendary 1913 Armory Show in New York Metropolis, which so traveled to Chicago and Boston. In the Armory show Pablo Picasso exhibited La Femme au pot de moutarde (1910), the sculpture Head of a Woman (Fernande) (1909–ten), Les Arbres (1907) amongst other cubist works. Jacques Villon exhibited seven of import and large drypoints, while his brother Marcel Duchamp shocked the American public with his painting Nude Descending a Staircase, No. 2 (1912). Francis Picabia exhibited his abstractions La Danse à la source and La Procession, Seville (both of 1912). Albert Gleizes exhibited La Femme aux phlox (1910) and L'Homme au balcon (1912), two highly stylized and faceted cubist works. Georges Braque, Fernand Léger, Raymond Duchamp-Villon, Roger de La Fresnaye and Alexander Archipenko as well contributed examples of their cubist works.

Cubist sculpture [edit]

Frontal view of the same bronze cast, 40.v × 23 × 26 cm

These photos were published in Umělecký Mĕsíčník, 1913[62]

Just equally in painting, Cubist sculpture is rooted in Paul Cézanne's reduction of painted objects into component planes and geometric solids (cubes, spheres, cylinders, and cones). And just as in painting, it became a pervasive influence and contributed fundamentally to Constructivism and Futurism.

Cubist sculpture developed in parallel to Cubist painting. During the autumn of 1909 Picasso sculpted Caput of a Woman (Fernande) with positive features depicted by negative space and vice versa. Co-ordinate to Douglas Cooper: "The first truthful Cubist sculpture was Picasso's impressive Woman'south Head, modeled in 1909–10, a analogue in 3 dimensions to many similar analytical and faceted heads in his paintings at the time."[12] These positive/negative reversals were ambitiously exploited past Alexander Archipenko in 1912–xiii, for example in Woman Walking.[5] Joseph Csaky, after Archipenko, was the first sculptor in Paris to join the Cubists, with whom he exhibited from 1911 onwards. They were followed by Raymond Duchamp-Villon and and then in 1914 by Jacques Lipchitz, Henri Laurens and Ossip Zadkine.[63] [64]

Indeed, Cubist construction was as influential as whatsoever pictorial Cubist innovation. Information technology was the stimulus backside the proto-Constructivist piece of work of both Naum Gabo and Vladimir Tatlin and thus the starting-betoken for the unabridged constructive tendency in 20th-century modernist sculpture.[5]

Compages [edit]

Le Corbusier, Assembly edifice, Chandigarh, Bharat

Cubism formed an important link betwixt early-20th-century art and compages.[65] The historical, theoretical, and socio-political relationships between avant-garde practices in painting, sculpture and architecture had early ramifications in French republic, Germany, the Netherlands and Czechoslovakia. Though in that location are many points of intersection between Cubism and architecture, but a few direct links between them can be fatigued. Most frequently the connections are made by reference to shared formal characteristics: faceting of form, spatial ambiguity, transparency, and multiplicity.[65]

Architectural interest in Cubism centered on the dissolution and reconstitution of 3-dimensional form, using simple geometric shapes, juxtaposed without the illusions of classical perspective. Various elements could be superimposed, made transparent or penetrate one another, while retaining their spatial relationships. Cubism had become an influential factor in the evolution of modern architecture from 1912 (La Maison Cubiste, by Raymond Duchamp-Villon and André Mare) onwards, developing in parallel with architects such equally Peter Behrens and Walter Gropius, with the simplification of edifice design, the use of materials appropriate to industrial production, and the increased employ of glass.[66]

Cubism was relevant to an architecture seeking a style that needed non refer to the by. Thus, what had become a revolution in both painting and sculpture was applied as office of "a profound reorientation towards a changed globe".[66] [67] The Cubo-Futurist ideas of Filippo Tommaso Marinetti influenced attitudes in avant-garde compages. The influential De Stijl movement embraced the aesthetic principles of Neo-plasticism adult by Piet Mondrian nether the influence of Cubism in Paris. De Stijl was likewise linked by Gino Severini to Cubist theory through the writings of Albert Gleizes. Even so, the linking of basic geometric forms with inherent dazzler and ease of industrial awarding—which had been prefigured by Marcel Duchamp from 1914—was left to the founders of Purism, Amédée Ozenfant and Charles-Édouard Jeanneret (ameliorate known as Le Corbusier,) who exhibited paintings together in Paris and published Après le cubisme in 1918.[66] Le Corbusier's ambition had been to interpret the backdrop of his own style of Cubism to compages. Between 1918 and 1922, Le Corbusier full-bodied his efforts on Purist theory and painting. In 1922, Le Corbusier and his cousin Jeanneret opened a studio in Paris at 35 rue de Sèvres. His theoretical studies presently advanced into many different architectural projects.[68]

La Maison Cubiste (Cubist House) [edit]

Raymond Duchamp-Villon, 1912, Study for La Maison Cubiste, Projet d'Hotel (Cubist House). Paradigm published in Les Peintres Cubistes, by Guillaume Apollinaire, 17 March 1913

Le Salon Bourgeois, designed by André Mare for La Maison Cubiste, in the decorative arts section of the Salon d'Automne, 1912, Paris. Metzinger'southward Femme à 50'Éventail on the left wall

At the 1912 Salon d'Automne an architectural installation was exhibited that quickly became known as Maison Cubiste (Cubist Business firm), with architecture by Raymond Duchamp-Villon and interior decoration past André Mare along with a group of collaborators. Metzinger and Gleizes in Du "Cubisme", written during the assemblage of the "Maison Cubiste", wrote nigh the democratic nature of art, stressing the signal that decorative considerations should not govern the spirit of fine art. Decorative piece of work, to them, was the "antithesis of the pic". "The true moving picture" wrote Metzinger and Gleizes, "bears its raison d'être within itself. It can be moved from a church to a drawing-room, from a museum to a written report. Essentially independent, necessarily complete, information technology need not immediately satisfy the mind: on the contrary, it should atomic number 82 it, picayune by little, towards the fictitious depths in which the coordinative low-cal resides. It does not harmonize with this or that ensemble; it harmonizes with things in general, with the universe: it is an organism...".[69]

La Maison Cubiste was a fully furnished model house, with a facade, a staircase, wrought atomic number 26 banisters, and two rooms: a living room—the Salon Conservative, where paintings by Marcel Duchamp, Metzinger (Adult female with a Fan), Gleizes, Laurencin and Léger were hung, and a bedroom. Information technology was an example of L'art décoratif, a abode within which Cubist art could be displayed in the comfort and style of modern, bourgeois life. Spectators at the Salon d'Automne passed through the plaster facade, designed past Duchamp-Villon, to the two furnished rooms.[70] This architectural installation was subsequently exhibited at the 1913 Arsenal Show, New York, Chicago and Boston,[71] listed in the catalogue of the New York exhibit as Raymond Duchamp-Villon, number 609, and entitled "Facade architectural, plaster" (Façade architecturale).[72] [73]

Jacques Doucet'south hôtel particulier, 33 rue Saint-James, Neuilly-sur-Seine

The furnishings, wallpaper, upholstery and carpets of the interior were designed by André Mare, and were early on examples of the influence of cubism on what would become Art Deco. They were composed of very brightly colored roses and other floral patterns in stylized geometric forms.

Mare called the living room in which Cubist paintings were hung the Salon Conservative. Léger described this name every bit 'perfect'. In a letter to Mare prior to the exhibition Léger wrote: "Your idea is absolutely splendid for u.s.a., really splendid. People volition encounter Cubism in its domestic setting, which is very important.[2]

"Mare's ensembles were accepted every bit frames for Cubist works considering they allowed paintings and sculptures their independence", Christopher Green wrote, "creating a play of contrasts, hence the involvement non just of Gleizes and Metzinger themselves, merely of Marie Laurencin, the Duchamp brothers (Raymond Duchamp-Villon designed the facade) and Mare's onetime friends Léger and Roger La Fresnaye".[74]

In 1927, Cubists Joseph Csaky, Jacques Lipchitz, Louis Marcoussis, Henri Laurens, the sculptor Gustave Miklos, and others collaborated in the decoration of a Studio House, rue Saint-James, Neuilly-sur-Seine, designed by the architect Paul Ruaud and owned by the French mode designer Jacques Doucet, besides a collector of Postal service-Impressionist and Cubist paintings (including Les Demoiselles d'Avignon, which he bought directly from Picasso'southward studio). Laurens designed the fountain, Csaky designed Doucet's staircase,[75] Lipchitz fabricated the fireplace mantel, and Marcoussis made a Cubist rug.[76] [77] [78]

Czech Cubist compages [edit]

The original Cubist architecture is very rare. Cubism was practical to compages just in Bohemia (today Czechia) and especially in its upper-case letter, Prague.[79] [eighty] Czech architects were the outset and but ones to ever design original Cubist buildings.[81] Cubist architecture flourished for the most office between 1910 and 1914, but the Cubist or Cubism-influenced buildings were as well congenital afterwards World State of war I. After the war, the architectural style chosen Rondo-Cubism was developed in Prague fusing the Cubist architecture with round shapes.[82]

In their theoretical rules, the Cubist architects expressed the requirement of dynamism, which would surmount the thing and calm contained in it, through a creative idea, so that the result would evoke feelings of dynamism and expressive plasticity in the viewer. This should be achieved by shapes derived from pyramids, cubes and prisms, past arrangements and compositions of oblique surfaces, mainly triangular, sculpted facades in protruding crystal-like units, reminiscent of the and then-called diamond cut, or even clangorous that are reminiscent of the belatedly Gothic architecture. In this way, the unabridged surfaces of the facades including even the gables and dormers are sculpted. The grilles as well as other architectural ornaments accomplish a three-dimensional form. Thus, new forms of windows and doors were besides created, east. g. hexagonal windows.[82] Czech Cubist architects also designed Cubist article of furniture.

The leading Cubist architects were Pavel Janák, Josef Gočár, Vlastislav Hofman, Emil Králíček and Josef Chochol.[82] They worked mostly in Prague only too in other Maverick towns. The best-known Cubist building is the Business firm of the Black Madonna in the Old Town of Prague built in 1912 past Josef Gočár with the only Cubist café in the world, Grand Café Orient.[79] Vlastislav Hofman built the archway pavilions of Ďáblice Cemetery in 1912–1914, Josef Chochol designed several residential houses under Vyšehrad. A Cubist streetlamp has also been preserved near the Wenceslas Square, designed past Emil Králíček in 1912, who also built the Diamond Firm in the New Boondocks of Prague around 1913.

Cubism in other fields [edit]

The influence of cubism extended to other artistic fields, exterior painting and sculpture. In literature, the written works of Gertrude Stein employ repetition and repetitive phrases equally building blocks in both passages and whole chapters. Near of Stein'southward of import works apply this technique, including the novel The Making of Americans (1906–08). Not only were they the first of import patrons of Cubism, Gertrude Stein and her brother Leo were also important influences on Cubism too. In turn, Picasso was an important influence on Stein'south writing. In the field of American fiction, William Faulkner's 1930 novel Every bit I Lay Dying can be read every bit an interaction with the cubist mode. The novel features narratives of the diverse experiences of 15 characters which, when taken together, produce a unmarried cohesive body.

The poets more often than not associated with Cubism are Guillaume Apollinaire, Blaise Cendrars, Jean Cocteau, Max Jacob, André Salmon and Pierre Reverdy. As American poet Kenneth Rexroth explains, Cubism in poetry "is the conscious, deliberate dissociation and recombination of elements into a new artistic entity made self-sufficient by its rigorous compages. This is quite dissimilar from the free clan of the Surrealists and the combination of unconscious utterance and political nihilism of Dada."[83] Nonetheless, the Cubist poets' influence on both Cubism and the later on movements of Dada and Surrealism was profound; Louis Aragon, founding member of Surrealism, said that for Breton, Soupault, Éluard and himself, Reverdy was "our immediate elder, the exemplary poet."[84] Though non as well remembered as the Cubist painters, these poets continue to influence and inspire; American poets John Ashbery and Ron Padgett take recently produced new translations of Reverdy'due south work. Wallace Stevens' "13 Ways of Looking at a Blackbird" is also said to demonstrate how cubism's multiple perspectives can be translated into poetry.[85]

John Berger said: "It is near impossible to exaggerate the importance of Cubism. It was a revolution in the visual arts as slap-up as that which took place in the early Renaissance. Its effects on afterwards art, on film, and on compages are already so numerous that we hardly notice them."[86]

Gallery [edit]

  • Pablo Picasso, 1913–14, Femme assise dans un fauteuil (Eva), Woman in an Armchair, oil on canvas, 149.9 ten 99.4 cm, Leonard A. Lauder Cubist Collection

  • Pablo Picasso, 1918, Arlequin au violon (Harlequin with Violin), oil on canvas, 142 x 100.3 cm, The Cleveland Museum of Art, Ohio

  • Gino Severini, 1919, Bohémien Jouant de Fifty'Accordéon (The Accordion Player), Museo del Novecento, Milan

Press articles and reviews [edit]

  • (center) Jean Metzinger, c.1913, Le Fumeur (Man with Piping), Carnegie Museum of Art, Pittsburgh; (left) Alexander Archipenko, 1914, Danseuse du Médrano (Médrano 2), (right) Archipenko, 1913, Pierrot-carrousel, Solomon R. Guggenheim Museum, New York. Published in Le Petit Comtois, thirteen March 1914

  • Paintings by Fernand Léger, 1912, La Femme en Bleu, Woman in Blue, Kunstmuseum Basel; Jean Metzinger, 1912, Dancer in a café, Albright-Knox Art Gallery; and sculpture by Alexander Archipenko, 1912, La Vie Familiale, Family Life (destroyed). Published in Les Annales politiques et littéraires, n. 1529, 13 October 1912

  • Paintings by Gino Severini, 1911, La Danse du Pan-Pan, and Severini, 1913, L'autobus. Published in "Les Annales politiques et littéraires", Le Paradoxe Cubiste, fourteen March 1920

  • Paintings past Gino Severini, 1911, Souvenirs de Voyage; Albert Gleizes, 1912, Homo on a Balustrade, L'Homme au balcon; Severini, 1912–13, Portrait de Mlle Jeanne Paul-Fort; Luigi Russolo, 1911–12, La Révolte. Published in "Les Annales politiques et littéraires", Le Paradoxe Cubiste (continued), n. 1916, xiv March 1920

  • Jean Metzinger, c.1911, Nature morte, Compotier et cruche décorée de cerfs; Juan Gris, 1911, Study for Man in a Café; Marie Laurencin, c.1911, Testa ab plechs; August Agero, sculpture, Bust; Juan Gris, 1912, Guitar and Glasses, or Banjo and Glasses. Published in Veu de Catalunya, 25 April 1912

  • Umberto Boccioni, 1911, La rue entre dans la maison; Luigi Russolo, 1911, Souvenir d'une nuit. Published in Les Annales politiques et littéraires, ane December 1912

  • Francis Picabia, paintings published in the New York Tribune, ix March 1913. Picabia held his start ane-man evidence in New York, Exhibition of New York studies by Francis Picabia, at 291 fine art gallery (formerly Lilliputian Galleries of the Photo-Secession), March 17 - April v, 1913

Encounter likewise [edit]

  • Fourth dimension in art
  • Precisionism
  • Proto-Cubism
  • Rayonism
  • Section d'Or

References [edit]

  1. ^ Jean Metzinger, Note sur la peinture, Pan (Paris), Oct–Nov 1910
  2. ^ a b Christopher Green, MoMA collection, Cubism, Introduction, from Grove Art Online, Oxford University Press, 2009 Archived 2014-08-13 at the Wayback Machine
  3. ^ Cubism: The Leonard A. Lauder Collection, The Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York, 2014 Archived 2015-05-17 at the Wayback Car
  4. ^ Christopher Green, MoMA collection Cubism, Origins and application of the term, from Grove Art Online, Oxford University Press, 2009 Archived 2014-06-xiii at the Wayback Automobile
  5. ^ a b c d e f m h i j k l k north o p q r Christopher Green, 2009, Cubism, MoMA, Grove Art Online, Oxford Academy Printing Archived 2014-08-13 at the Wayback Machine
  6. ^ Joann Moser, Jean Metzinger in Retrospect, Pre-Cubist works, 1904–1909, The University of Iowa Museum of Fine art, J. Paul Getty Trust, Academy of Washington Press 1985, pp. 34–42
  7. ^ Hajo Düchting, Orphism, MoMA, Grove Art Online, Oxford University Printing, 2009
  8. ^ Magdalena Dabrowski, Geometric Abstraction, Heilbrunn Timeline of Art History, The Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York, 2000
  9. ^ a b Christopher Green, 2009, Cubism, Meanings and interpretations, MoMA, Grove Art Online, Oxford University Printing, 2009 Archived 2015-07-02 at the Wayback Car
  10. ^ Christina Lodder, 2009, Constructivism, Formation, 1914–21, MoMA, Grove Fine art Online, Oxford Academy Printing, 2009 Archived 2008-ten-24 at the Wayback Machine
  11. ^ Accolade, H. and J. Fleming, (2009) A World History of Art. 7th edn. London: Laurence King Publishing, p. 784. ISBN 9781856695848
  12. ^ a b Douglas Cooper, "The Cubist Epoch", pp. 11–221, 232, Phaidon Press Express 1970 in association with the Los Angeles County Museum of Art and the Metropolitan Museum of Art ISBN 0-87587-041-4
  13. ^ a b c Cooper, 24
  14. ^ Louis Vauxcelles, Exposition Braques, Gil Blas, 14 November 1908, Gallica (BnF)
  15. ^ a b Danchev, Alex (March 29, 2007). Georges Braque: A Life. Penguin Books Limited. ISBN9780141905006 – via Google Books.
  16. ^ Futurism in Paris – The Avant-garde Explosion, Center Pompidou, Paris 2008
  17. ^ Louis Vauxcelles, Le Salon des Indépendants, Gil Blas, 25 March 1909, Gallica (BnF)
  18. ^ D.-H. Kahnweiler. Der Weg zum Kubismus (Munich, 1920; Eng. trans., New York, 1949)
  19. ^ C. Greenberg. The Pasted-paper Revolution, ARTnews, 57 (1958), pp. 46–nine, 60–61; repr. as 'Collage' in Art and Civilisation (Boston, 1961), pp. 70–83
  20. ^ Berger, John (1969). The Moment of Cubism . New York, NY: Pantheon. ISBN9780297177098.
  21. ^ a b "Fondation Gleizes, Chronologie (in French)" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on November 12, 2008.
  22. ^ "Gil Blas / dir. A. Dumont". Gallica. March eighteen, 1910.
  23. ^ Daniel Robbins, Jean Metzinger: At the Middle of Cubism, 1985, Jean Metzinger in Retrospect, The University of Iowa Museum of Fine art, J. Paul Getty Trust, University of Washington Press
  24. ^ a b c Guillaume Apollinaire, Les Peintres cubistes: Méditations esthétiques (Paris, 1913)
  25. ^ "Eiffel Tower". The Guggenheim Museums and Foundation. Archived from the original on February 28, 2014.
  26. ^ "The Wild Men of Paris". world wide web.architecturalrecord.com. Archived from the original on April 24, 2016.
  27. ^ a b "Eccentric School of Painting Increases Its Faddy in the Current Art Exhibition --- What Its Followers Attempt to Do". October 8, 1911. Archived from the original on March five, 2016 – via NYTimes.com.
  28. ^ a b "The "Cubists" Dominate Paris' Fall Salon, The New York Times, Oct 8, 1911 (High-resolution PDF)" (PDF).
  29. ^ Philadelphia Museum of Art, Marcel Duchamp, Nude Descending a Staircase, No. 2 Archived 2017-09-xviii at the Wayback Machine
  30. ^ "Statens Museum for Kunst, National Gallery of Denmark, Jean Metzinger, 1911–12, Woman with a Horse, oil on canvas, 162 × 130 cm". Archived from the original on January xv, 2012.
  31. ^ a b Mark Antliff and Patricia Leighten, A Cubism Reader, Documents and Criticism, 1906–1914, University of Chicago Press, 2008, pp. 293–295
  32. ^ Carol A. Hess, Manuel de Falla and Modernism in Spain, 1898–1936, University of Chicago Press, 2001, p. 76, ISBN 0226330389
  33. ^ Commemoració del centenari del cubisme a Barcelona. 1912–2012, Associació Catalana de Crítics d'Fine art – ACCA
  34. ^ Mercè Vidal, L'exposició d'Art Cubista de les Galeries Dalmau 1912, Edicions Universitat Barcelona, 1996, ISBN 8447513831
  35. ^ David Cottington, Cubism in the Shadow of War: The Advanced and Politics in Paris 1905–1914, Yale University Press, 1998, ISBN 0300075294
  36. ^ "Exposició d'Fine art Cubista". Dalmau Galleries.
  37. ^ Joaquim Folch i Torres, Els Cubistes a cân Dalmau, Pàgina artística de La Veu de Catalunya Archived 2018-04-22 at the Wayback Automobile (Barcelona) 18 April 1912, Whatever 22, núm. 4637–4652 (xvi–xxx abr. 1912)
  38. ^ Joaquim Folch y Torres, "El cubisme", Pàgina Artística de La Veu, La Veu de Catalunya, 25 April 1912 (includes numerous articles on the artists and exhibition)
  39. ^ a b William H. Robinson, Jordi Falgàs, Carmen Belen Lord, Barcelona and Modernity: Picasso, Gaudí, Miró, Dalí, Cleveland Museum of Art, Metropolitan Museum of Art (New York), Yale University Printing, 2006, ISBN 0300121067
  40. ^ Cubist caricature, Esquella de La Torratxa, Núm 1740 (3 maig 1912)
  41. ^ a b "[Exposició d'Art Cubista - Noticiero Universal]". Dalmau Galleries.
  42. ^ Jaime Brihuega, Las Vanguardias Artísticas en España 1909–1936, Madrid. Istmo.1981
  43. ^ "Le Journal". Gallica. October 5, 1912. Archived from the original on September 4, 2015.
  44. ^ a b Journal officiel de la République française. Débats parlementaires. Chambre des députés, 3 Décembre 1912, pp. 2924–2929. Bibliothèque et Archives de 50'Assemblée nationale, 2012–7516 Archived 2015-09-04 at the Wayback Automobile. ISSN 1270-5942
  45. ^ Patrick F. Barrer: Quand l'fine art du XXe siècle était conçu par les inconnus, pp. 93–101, gives an business relationship of the debate.
  46. ^ "biography". world wide web.peterbrooke.org.great britain. Archived from the original on May 22, 2013.
  47. ^ "Albert-Gleizes-œuvre". September 18, 2007. Archived from the original on 2007-09-18.
  48. ^ a b "The History and Chronology of Cubism, p. five". Archived from the original on March 14, 2013.
  49. ^ "La Section d'Or, Numéro spécial, ix Octobre 1912". Archived from the original on Apr 3, 2017.
  50. ^ Cooper, twenty–27
  51. ^ a b c d due east f g Robbins, Daniel (Apr nineteen, 1964). "Albert Gleizes, 1881-1953 : a retrospective exhibition". [New York : Solomon R. Guggenheim Foundation] – via Internet Annal.
  52. ^ Louis Chassevent, Les Artistes Indépendants, 1906, Quelques Petits Salons. Paris, 1908. Chassevent discussed Delaunay and Metzinger in terms of Signac's influence, referring to Metzinger's "precision in the cut of his cubes..."
  53. ^ a b Robert Herbert, Neo-Impressionism, The Solomon R. Guggenheim Foundation, New York, 1968
  54. ^ A. Gleizes and J. Metzinger. Du "Cubisme", Edition Figuière, Paris, 1912 (Eng. trans., London, 1913)
  55. ^ "Mercure de French republic : série moderne / directeur Alfred Vallette". Gallica. December 1, 1912. Archived from the original on September 4, 2015.
  56. ^ a b Cottington, David (April 19, 2004). Cubism and Its Histories. Manchester University Printing. ISBN9780719050046. Archived from the original on January 1, 2016 – via Google Books.
  57. ^ Christopher Light-green, Cubism and Its Enemies: Modern Movements and Reaction in French Art, 1916–1928 Archived 2016-01-01 at the Wayback Car, Yale University Press, New Haven and London, 1987, ISBN 0300034687
  58. ^ "The Museum of Mod Art". Moma.org. Retrieved 2011-06-11 .
  59. ^ Kolokytha, Chara; Hammond, J.Grand.; Vlčková, Lucie. "Cubism". Routledge Encyclopedia of Modernism.
  60. ^ Archive, Asia Art. "Cubism in Asia: Unbounded Dialogues – Report". aaa.org.hk . Retrieved 2018-12-22 .
  61. ^ Gris, Juan. "Portrait of Pablo Picasso". The Art Found of Chicago . Retrieved 2021-06-07 .
  62. ^ Pablo Picasso, 1909–10, Caput of a Adult female, bronze, published in Umělecký Mĕsíčník, 1913 Archived 2014-03-03 at the Wayback Car, Blue Mount Project, Princeton University
  63. ^ Robert Rosenblum, "Cubism," Readings in Art History 2 (1976), Seuphor, Sculpture of this Century
  64. ^ Balas, Edith (Apr 19, 1998). Joseph Csáky: A Pioneer of Modernistic Sculpture. American Philosophical Society. ISBN9780871692306. Archived from the original on January 1, 2016 – via Google Books.
  65. ^ a b Architecture and cubism. Centre canadien d'compages/Canadian Centre for Compages : MIT Printing. Apr 19, 2002. OCLC 915987228 – via Open WorldCat.
  66. ^ a b c "The Drove | MoMA". The Museum of Modern Fine art. Archived from the original on April v, 2012.
  67. ^ P. R. Banham. Theory and Pattern in the Commencement Auto Age (London, 1960), p. 203
  68. ^ Choay, Françoise, le corbusier (1960), pp. 10–11. George Braziller, Inc. ISBN 0-8076-0104-7
  69. ^ "Albert Gleizes and Jean Metzinge, except from Du Cubisme, 1912" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on June ii, 2013.
  70. ^ La Maison Cubiste, 1912 Archived 2013-03-thirteen at the Wayback Motorcar
  71. ^ Kubistische werken op de Arsenal Show Archived 2013-03-13 at the Wayback Car
  72. ^ "Detail of Duchamp-Villon's Façade architecturale, 1913, from the Walt Kuhn Family papers and Armory Show records, 1859-1984, majority 1900-1949". www.aaa.si.edu. Archived from the original on March 14, 2013.
  73. ^ "Catalogue of international exhibition of modern art: at the Arsenal of the Threescore-ninth Infantry". Association of American Painters and Sculptors. April 19, 1913 – via Net Annal.
  74. ^ Light-green, Christopher (January 1, 2000). Art in France, 1900-1940. Yale University Printing. ISBN0300099088. Archived from the original on November 30, 2016 – via Google Books.
  75. ^ Light-green, Christopher (2000). Joseph Csaky's staircase in the home of Jacques Doucet. ISBN0300099088. Archived from the original on xxx Apr 2016. Retrieved 18 December 2012.
  76. ^ Male monarch, Aestheticus (fourteen April 2011). "Jacques Doucet's Studio St. James at Neuilly-sur-Seine". Aestheticusrex.blogspot.com.es. Archived from the original on 27 March 2013. Retrieved xviii December 2012.
  77. ^ Imbert, Dorothée (1993). The Modernist Garden in French republic, Dorothée Imbert, 1993, Yale University Press. ISBN0300047169. Archived from the original on 30 April 2016. Retrieved 18 Dec 2012.
  78. ^ Balas, Edith (1998). Joseph Csáky: A Pioneer of Modern Sculpture, Edith Balas, 1998, p. five. ISBN9780871692306. Archived from the original on xxx Apr 2016. Retrieved 18 December 2012.
  79. ^ a b Boněk, Jan (2014). Cubist Prague. Prague: Eminent. p. 9. ISBN978-80-7281-469-5.
  80. ^ "Cubism". www.czechtourism.com. CzechTourism. Archived from the original on 16 October 2015. Retrieved 1 September 2015.
  81. ^ "Cubist architecture". world wide web.radio.cz. Radio Prague. Archived from the original on 11 September 2015. Retrieved 1 September 2015.
  82. ^ a b c "Czech Cubism". www.kubista.cz. Kubista. Archived from the original on eight October 2015. Retrieved 1 September 2015.
  83. ^ Rexroth, Kenneth. "The Cubist Poetry of Pierre Reverdy (Rexroth)". Bopsecrets.org. Archived from the original on 2011-05-19. Retrieved 2011-06-11 .
  84. ^ Reverdy, Pierre. "Title Page > Pierre Reverdy: Selected Poems". Bloodaxe Books. Archived from the original on 2011-05-27. Retrieved 2011-06-eleven .
  85. ^ "Untitled Document". Archived from the original on 2007-08-13. Retrieved 2008-04-07 .
  86. ^ Berger, John. (1965). The Success and Failure of Picasso. Penguin Books, Ltd. p. 73. ISBN 978-0-679-73725-four.

Further reading [edit]

  • Alfred H. Barr, Jr., Cubism and Abstract Art, New York: Museum of Mod Art, 1936.
  • Cauman, John (2001). Inheriting Cubism: The Bear on of Cubism on American Art, 1909–1936. New York: Hollis Taggart Galleries. ISBN0-9705723-4-4.
  • Cooper, Douglas (1970). The Cubist Epoch. London: Phaidon in association with the Los Angeles Canton Museum of Art & the Metropolitan Museum of Art. ISBN0-87587-041-4.
  • Paolo Vincenzo Genovese, Cubismo in architettura, Mancosu Editore, Roma, 2010. In Italian.
  • John Golding, Cubism: A History and an Analysis, 1907-1914, New York: Wittenborn, 1959.
  • Richardson, John. A Life Of Picasso, The Cubist Insubordinate 1907–1916. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1991. ISBN 978-0-307-26665-1
  • Mark Antliff and Patricia Leighten, A Cubism Reader, Documents and Criticism, 1906–1914, The University of Chicago Printing, 2008
  • Christopher Light-green, Cubism and its Enemies, Modern Movements and Reaction in French Art, 1916–28, Yale University Printing, New Haven and London, 1987
  • Mikhail Lifshitz, The Crisis of Ugliness: From Cubism to Pop-Art. Translated and with an Introduction by David Riff. Leiden: BRILL, 2018 (originally published in Russian by Iskusstvo, 1968)
  • Daniel Robbins, Sources of Cubism and Futurism, Fine art Periodical, Vol. 41, No. four, (Wintertime 1981)
  • Cécile Debray, Françoise Lucbert, La Section d'or, 1912-1920-1925, Musées de Châteauroux, Musée Fabre, exhibition catalogue, Éditions Cercle d'art, Paris, 2000
  • Ian Johnston, Preliminary Notes on Cubist Architecture in Prague, 2004

External links [edit]

  • Cubism, Heilbrunn Timeline of Art History, Metropolitan Museum of Fine art
  • Cubism, Agence Photographique de la Réunion des musées nationaux et du Grand Palais des Champs-Elysées (RMN)
  • Czech Cubist Architecture
  • Cubism, Guggenheim Collection Online
  • Index of Historic Collectors and Dealers of Cubism, Leonard A. Lauder Research Heart for Modern Art, Metropolitan Museum of Art
  • Elizabeth Carlson, Cubist Fashion: Mainstreaming Modernism after the Arsenal, Winterthur Portfolio, Vol. 48, No. 1 (Leap 2014), pp. 1–28. doi:10.1086/675687

lawrensonbeely1974.blogspot.com

Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cubism